Were it not for the West to wear you .. Activists commented on Netanyahu slippers policy

29 May 2025 - 6:09 pm

Arab activists interacted with the fact that one of the Israeli journalists raised Shabshba on the screen as he asks Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – who is required for the International Criminal Court – about the reason for his failure to win the resistance in the Gaza Strip.

Episode 2025/5/29 of the “Networks” program dealt with the incident of raising the journalist in the Israeli channel 13, Golden tea, the slippers in one of his programs, and directed his speech toNetanyahu He said, “How did you fail to win over those who fight while wearing the jersey? Where is the problem? The problem is you.”

Network

Netanyahu responded at a press conference, last Wednesday, to accusations of negligence and responsibility for the seventh of October 2023And he tried to reduce the operation and talked about its perpetrators, who said they were wearing the jerseys.

But the former leader of the Northern Corps in occupation armyNaoum Tebon, responded to Netanyahu, saying that my fighter agitation “They were well armed with protective jackets, helmets,” RPG “, supernatural shots and perspectives.”

Also, Channel 12 correspondent, Danny Hecht, quoted an officer who fought on that day as saying: “Whoever is truly wearing the Shabashb is our leaders and our supreme military leadership.”

The officer added that those who described them as “saboteurs” were armed from their feet, to their heads with explosive materials that are sufficient for a small army, in addition to hundreds of misfortunes that destroyed arms systems and the best tanks in the world.

Netanyahu contradicts himself

The platforms of communication with this debate interacted, some of them said that the Israelis were the ones who would wear the Shabashb had it not been for Western support, while others said that Netanyahu came out every day with a statement that contradicts what he said in the past.

Commenting on this matter, an account called “Tiger” wrote: “Were it not for the heavy Western support with the weapon of the Zionists, the workers would have been controlling Tel Aviv now and without exaggeration.”

Amer Abu Al -Yusr also wrote: “Indeed, an unaccounted for military equipment, like the rest of the world’s armies, but they are resisting simple tools, do not compare what the occupation army has and they were able to fight you.”

As for Lama Abu Hamida, she said: “Netanyahu every day comes out with contradictory statements as if he forgets what he says … once he raises the danger of Hamas and October 7 (October), and times that reduces their affairs and says to the spasbes,” adding: “I send you on righteousness and not afraid of the trial?”

Finally, Alia wrote: “His statements about Al -Shabashb will pay for them because of the division of Israel in popularity and military.”

The criticisms leveled against Netanyahu were not only limited to the military side, but also extended to include the political dimension as well, as the wave of anger held by an external “political tsunami” that strikes Israel.

These criticisms indicated that countries are one of the closest international allies of Tel Aviv that announced itself from his government, against the backdrop of the ongoing military operations in Gaza and the exacerbation of the suffering of civilians.